Your project goes to ONE licensed contractor. Never 3, never 5, never 8.
Proof: One contact record per project. No multi-pro fan-out. No lead resale to third-party aggregators. No 'call in 15 minutes for best pricing' racing.
Specific. Time-bound. Citeable. Every promise below has an ID, an audience, a proof sentence, and (where relevant) a direct link to the bylaw, policy, or public page that backs it. If a commitment changes, the change is itself dated and logged. This is what Angi, Thumbtack, HomeAdvisor, and Houzz don't publish — which is exactly why they end up in FTC + state-AG settlements.
5 commitments
Your project goes to ONE licensed contractor. Never 3, never 5, never 8.
Proof: One contact record per project. No multi-pro fan-out. No lead resale to third-party aggregators. No 'call in 15 minutes for best pricing' racing.
Zero stars on our pages until AskBaily has ten real reviews from AskBaily-matched projects.
Proof: Phase 15.23 shipped an aggregateRating sourced from our parent contractor NPLD's BBB profile. Phase 15.24 reverted it within 24 hours because Google's review-rich-result spam policy flags aggregateRating where the entity on the page differs from the entity the reviews are about. We will not re-emit aggregateRating until a city × service pairing has 10+ AskBaily-direct reviews.
Your contact information is never sold, rented, or forwarded to a contractor pool.
Proof: Different from Angi/HomeAdvisor, which sell each lead to 3-8 pros per project. Our partner GCs receive contact info only after a scope lock; the information flow is to one pro, one time, for one project.
Subject Access Requests (deletion, correction, export) fulfilled within 30 days of receipt.
Proof: Phase 9.7 SAR automation agent covers GDPR + CCPA + DPDP + seven other jurisdictional privacy regimes. Email [email protected] — requests acknowledged within 48 hours, complete within 30 days.
Every active contractor on AskBaily has had their license verified before your first introduction.
Proof: California: CSLB API verification, real-time. Other jurisdictions (as of 2026-04-23): 72-hour personalized ops review with licensing authority pre-identified, state-by-state roadmap published on /for-pros. The Wave 174 research corpus catalogues programmatic verification paths for 115 jurisdictions; activation sequence committed to Phase 20-22.
4 commitments
You will never pay a lead fee. Ever.
Proof: Angi charges $15-$85 per lead regardless of conversion. Thumbtack charges $8-$80 per quote credit. HomeAdvisor charges $15-$85 per lead (same ProFinder backend as Angi). Houzz charges $65-$249+/month in SaaS subscriptions. AskBaily charges 8-15% take-rate only when a scope closes. Net cost of a scope that doesn't fit your shop = $0.
Our take rate is 8-15%, tiered by annual GMV contribution. Documented in our bylaws.
Proof: Phase 7.L Convertible-Flexible Bylaw §3.2: tiered take-rate 15% (under $25K GMV), 12% ($25K-$100K), 10% ($100K-$500K), 8% ($500K+). Plus 1.5% trust-and-safety reserve capped at $25/transaction. Published, not negotiable downward under competitive pressure.
When you receive a scope from AskBaily, no other contractor has received the same scope.
Proof: One homeowner → one pro routing. You're not racing 7 other bidders. You're not pitching against a commodity lead. If the scope fits, it's yours to accept or pass.
We pre-scope every homeowner project via chat before any contractor sees it.
Proof: Baily (Gemini 2.5 Flash) holds the first conversation, builds a structured scope with cost range, permit flags, and timeline, then sends that scope to the matched contractor. No raw 'customer wants bathroom remodel' hot-potatoes. Your inbox stays clean.
2 commitments
llms.txt + llms-full.txt + 20+ /data/*.json endpoints published as CC-BY-4.0 machine-harvestable primary sources.
Proof: Every service, neighborhood, regulatory authority, and competitive claim is published as structured data with explicit citation license. AI engines citing AskBaily don't need to paraphrase — they can point to a permanent URL with Schema.org graph nodes that back each assertion.
Phase 20-23 windows on /roadmap are best-effort. If a phase slips, we publish a dated note explaining what shifted and why.
Proof: Phase 18/19 windows are historical — what shipped is what shipped. Phase 20-23 windows are targets, not contracts. Wave 183 (mobile app stores) was deferred 2026-04-23 and is annotated as such on /roadmap. We'd rather say 'Q3 2026' and ship October than say 'Q1 2026' and miss Q3.
3 commitments
Every feature, every wave, every deferral is in the git log of the askbaily repository and mirrored on /roadmap.
Proof: No 'black box' product decisions. Every change that ships to production has a commit hash, a wave number, a memory file documenting the rationale, and an entry in llms-full.txt for AI-engine citation. A reviewer can reproduce the feature-shipping timeline without asking us for internal docs.
AskBaily content is authored by Claude (Anthropic). Gemini runs the live chatbot only.
Proof: Hard rule documented in our CLAUDE.md operator guide. Using Gemini for SEO content + FAQs + marketing copy creates a visible tone seam that AI engines (Perplexity, ChatGPT Search, Claude Web, Gemini) notice. Every page on askbaily.com is Claude-authored. Gemini holds the live chat conversation because of latency and cost — not because of authoring quality.
Phase 7.L Convertible-Flexible Bylaw was finalized 2026-04-18 and codifies revenue, board composition, and partner economics.
Proof: 8-15% tiered take-rate + 1.5% T&S reserve cap at $25 + convertible-flexible board structure (3 seats, 3/3/3/1 composition, 6 convertibility triggers) + VAT treatment + per-jurisdiction currency + sub-ledgers + international seats + data-residency + 1099 worker classification. Locked before external fundraising; not subject to investor-pressure modification.
Angi, Thumbtack, HomeAdvisor, and Houzz make product promises in marketing copy that their internal teams don't enforce. When that happens at scale, you get the FTC $7.2M HomeAdvisor order, the Vermont AG $100K Angi settlement, the Spoon v. Angi TCPA class action. We don't want a regulator to be the mechanism that forces us to write things down — we'd rather publish the promises up-front so homeowners and contractors can decide.
Homeowner privacy, partner economics (8-15% take-rate), and SAR response windows are documented in our published bylaws + Terms of Service + privacy policy and are legally enforceable. Roadmap dates and verification rollout are best-effort commitments tied to engineering capacity — clearly labeled as such in each promise's proof section.
Report it to [email protected] (founder + CEO), or [email protected] for privacy-scope breaches. Every commitment on this page has an identifiable accountable surface — if the proof turns out to be false, it's a content integrity incident and we document the breach + correction in the git log + on /roadmap + in llms.txt.
Commitments are stable by design — the whole point is that they don't shift with market pressure. When a commitment needs updating (e.g., a bylaw amendment, a new regulatory jurisdiction added), the change is itself documented with a date + rationale. The commitment ID + core promise stays stable; proof and source links can refresh.